Archives for the month of: May, 2013



Oh I see, when conservative SuperPACs get profiled by the IRS, suddenly the GOP is the party of civil liberties! I guess they’ll support Obamacare and gay marriage next … 

If corporations are people, why aren’t the CEO and Board of Directors of HSBC in jail for laundering drug money?

I think the problem isn’t that the IRS looked into conservative political non-profits, but that they didn’t look into ALL political non-profits and PACs and Super-PACs for tax fraud.  There’s fine line between all these organization’s activities and illegal campaign finance and tax violations.  Some of these organizations, especially the Super-PACs, seem to exploit their non-for-profit status, which is something the IRS is charged with investigating.  After the SCOTUS Citizen’s United decision, it was inevitable that the IRS would have to look out for non-for-profit status abuses by political organization.  The issue is not that they did so, but that they did so unevenly, IMHO.

TV is now better than Hollywood, which wasn’t always the case …

Turns out: private sector healthcare providers DO NOT feel pressure from competition to bill, well, competitively. (GOP, please take notice.)


I’m not sure who first said “information wants to be free” but I’m certain it wasn’t the information itself.  Left on its own, information just sits there and never seeks to do any traveling at all.  Even it today’s world information moves too slow and rarely gets to where it most needs to be.  Unless the information is of a particularly cute cat or kitten, most information is ignored altogether.  Information doesn’t go viral on its own, you need a vast network of people pushing it around for that effect; ask any PR flack or SEO practitioner.  Information is inert, I say.

Defense Distributed has successfully made and tested a gun printed with a 3D printer and intends to make the 3D printer plans available for free.  I’d expect some recoil and blowback at the very least (and not from the gun itself)!

Text on their website says DD “is a pending 501(c)(3) status nonprofit corporation in the state of Texas”.  That’s some odd wording as it sort of implies DD is waiting on TX to grant it 501(c)(3) status when that status is actually awarded by the federal government via the IRS.  I’d imagine that status will not be granted as I don’t think the feds are going to look too favorably upon DD’s goals.  The Obama Administration supports sensible gun control laws.  What DD intends to do is easily argued as insensible   According the the ATF, DD has an FFL.  (But it seems that they acquired it only after the company that was leasing them a 3D printer took the printer back because DD didn’t have an FFL.)  If the feds want to shut DD down, they can refuse to renew the FFL when it expires after its three year term.  DD activities can also be argued to run afoul of many of the laws of the Gun Control Act of 1968.

I suppose DD is going to take a free-speech defense and claim that distributing their 3D printer plans is an exercise in First Amendment rights.  I’d expect the feds to claim DD is yelling fire in crowded movie theater.  I don’t feel DD is going to be able to use the Second Amendment as a shied to avoid the responsibilities required in exercising First Amendment rights.  But then again, bomb making plans are readily available on the internet, so this should be an interesting debate/fight.

DD claims to “defend the civil liberty of popular access to arms as guaranteed by the United States Constitution and affirmed by the United States Supreme Court”.  Well, it’s not like that right is in any way being denied to Americans, so the feds can argue that DD is going too far and that their motives are more anarchic.  After all, Cody R. Wilson, one of the principals behind DD, says he’s an crypto-anarchist.  The feds don’t those guys either!  Look at Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, Aaron Swartz for proof.  Also, it can be also said that while DD might feel it is solely defending civil rights, it’s also making and distributing firearms.  Claims to being solely a civil rights organization will fall on deaf ears.  But whatever, DD will probably just then pivot away from a non-profit, civil rights stance and just become a for-profit manufacturing company if it’s not one already.

If the feds can’t shut DD down with existing laws, I’d imagine that news one will be made to close loopholes DD exploits.

Who’s in favor of a plastic gun anyway?  What would you use it for other than to get it past a metal detector?  I can’t imagine a plastic gun is going to be very reliable (i.e. safe) or have a long life span.  And it’s damn ugly!

%d bloggers like this: